LWC Dynamic with Attrs/Props/Event listeners


This proposal augments lwc:dynamic to not just accept the constructor, but also the properties/attributes/event listeners that are passed to the component. This allows them to be changed dynamically.


component config: properties/attributes/event/constructor listeners on a component

Basic example

// x/app.html
    <x-cmp lwc:dynamic={cmpConfig}></x-cmp>
// x/app.js
import { LightningElement } from 'lwc';

export default class App extends LightningElement {
    async loadCtor() {
        const constructor = await import("x/child");

        const attrs = { style: 'color: red;' };
        const props = { name: 'John Foo' };
        const eventListeners = { onchange: handleChange };

        this.cmpConfig = { constructor, attrs, props, eventListeners };

In the above example, <x-cmp> is created with the constructor x/child. The <x-cmp> element will have the style as an attribute, name assigned as a property and handleChange added as an event listener of type change.


lwc:dynamic allows component authors to lazily instantiate components. However, the props that we pass to the component can't be dynamic: we need to pass them in the template HTML itself.

This is a problem when the component constructor is changed at runtime: the new constructor, might need a different set of properties than the earlier one.

We can, of course, not pass any props and once the element renders, query the element and set the props programmatically. We lose reactivity this way and also force the component to handle null props which might not be desirable.

This proposal allows lwc:dynamic to accept a config along with the constructor.

Detailed design

lwc:dynamic currently accepts a LightningElementConstructor to be passed. With this proposal, we modify it to accept LightningElementConstructor | LightningElementConfig where

type LightningElementConfig = {
    constructor: LightningElementConstructor,
    attrs: Record<string, any>,
    props: Record<string, any>,
    eventListeners: Record<`on${string}`, any>,

LWC engine should continue working as before when lwc:dynamic receives a LightningElementConstructor.

However, if it receives an object, it should consider it config The newly created component should be instantiated with the above attributes, keys and event listeners.

It is worth noting that event listeners declared in the template are bound to the component. Event listeners declared via lwc:dynamic in this proposal should also be bound to the component.


The object passed to lwc:dynamic is reactive. If the constructor changes, it is equivalent to how lwc:dynamic works currently: a new component is created along with the config

Reactivity on theconfig significantly from what we had earlier because:

  1. Attributes and Properties can't change shape: we can't have new attributes that we didn't have in the previous render, currently. Same for properties.
  2. Event listeners can't be changed at all: we can't have new event listeners or even change earlier ones.

The above restrictions need to be removed for accepting a config lwc:dynamic.

Attributes change

  1. Key in new render, but not in old render: attribute is added.
  2. Key in old render, but not in new render: attribute is removed.
  3. Key in old render and also in new render: attribute is present and is subject to current diffing algo.

Properties change

  1. Key in new render, but not in old render: property is set to the value passed.
  2. Key in old render, but not in new render: property is left untouched.
  3. Key in old render and also in new render: property is set to the value passed. Essentially, for properties, we just go over the property set everytime and set those properties.

Listeners change

  1. Key in new render, but not in old render: listener is added.
  2. Key in old render, but not in new render: listener is removed.
  3. Key in old render and also in new render: if the value is same as older one, do nothing. Else remove old listener and add new listener.

Duplicate properties

Duplicate keys within config

Duplicate keys cannot exist within attrs, props and eventListeners since these are objects. However, the same key can be present in attrs as well as in props. Moreover, some keys that are different actually do the same function, e.g. aria-label as an attribute does the same thing as ariaLabel as a property.

For handling this problem, we simply apply attrs and then apply props, leading to props overriding attrs.

This is not a problem for event listeners since they don't conflict with attrs or props. All event listeners should start with on and we should a runtime throw error when attrs/props start with on.

Duplicate keys within config and template A property can be declared in both the template and the config.

    <x-cmp style="color: red;" lwc:dynamic={cmp}></x-cmp>
// ... assuming the rest of the class
loadCtor = async () => {
    this.cmp = {
        constructor: await import("x/child"),
        attrs: { style: "color: blue; " }

One solution is to throw on detecting any attributes in the template when lwc:dynamic accepts an object. Since, the config can contain all the attributes/properties/event listeners, it's not required to declare any in the template. This needs to be a runtime check, since we can't know at compile time if lwc:dynamic is accepting an object or a function (in which case it can accept config the template itself).

Another solution is to always give precedence to what we have in the config.


One of the biggest drawbacks is that it prevents static analysis of the component. However, if components were using the programmatic way of assigning properties, then those were not statically analyzable anyway.

Adoption strategy

lwc:dynamic itself is behind a gate which needs to be enabled. This feature will be part of the same gate: if you have access to lwc:dynamic, you can use it in the earlier way (passing a function) or in this way.

How we teach this

Since lwc:dyanamic is currently allowed only for internal developers, an internal doc describing would be required. In addition, updating the OSS doc on lwc:dynamic would be required.